Rankings updated monthly — View live standings →

Semgrep

Lightweight, pattern-matching static analysis built for security teams who need custom, organization-specific rules.

8.1
AT500 Score
Rank #16 in Coding & Software AI
▲ +2
Starting priceFree (self-host or <10 devs), $30-40/contributor/mo
Pricing modelFreemium
Founded2016
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA

About Semgrep

Semgrep is an open-source static application security testing engine built around a lightweight pattern-matching approach, letting security teams write custom rules in a syntax close to the target programming language rather than learning a separate rules DSL. This makes it especially popular with security teams enforcing organization-specific policies across many repositories. It is free to self-host with unlimited use for the open-source engine, and free for hosted Teams plans under 10 developers, with paid tiers running roughly $30-40 per contributor per month for Semgrep Code or Supply Chain, plus a separate $15/contributor/month Secrets add-on. Independent benchmarks show Semgrep leads specifically on security-finding accuracy, with its AI-assisted triage agreeing with human security researchers on true positives about 96% of the time, though it explicitly does not cover code quality metrics, complexity analysis, or duplication detection the way SonarQube does.

Key features

Custom rule authoring
Write security rules in syntax close to the target language, not a separate DSL
AI-assisted triage
Automatically handles roughly 60% of security triage, 96% agreement with human researchers
Free open-source engine
Self-hostable with unlimited use at no cost
OWASP Top 10 coverage
Built-in rules covering standard security benchmarks out of the box

Pros and cons

✓ Pros
Strongest custom security rule authoring of any tool in the category
Free, unlimited self-hosted engine with no vendor lock-in
AI triage assistant genuinely reduces false-positive fatigue for security teams
Free hosted tier for teams under 10 developers lowers the barrier to entry
✗ Cons
Narrowly security-focused: no code quality metrics, complexity analysis, or duplication detection
Not AI-native for general code review the way CodeRabbit or Greptile are
Requires security expertise to get full value from custom rule authoring
Paid tiers stack per product (Code, Supply Chain, Secrets), adding cost for full coverage

Best for

Security teams needing custom, organization-specific SAST rulesTeams wanting a free, self-hostable security scanning engineOrganizations already running a separate AI code review tool wanting a security layerCompliance-driven teams needing OWASP Top 10 and SANS Top 25 coverage

Why this score

Leading open-source SAST engine for custom security rules, free for teams under 10 developers